ArticleBMC genomics2025
Tick genomics through a Nanopore: a low-cost approach for tick genomics.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The first chromosome-scale genome assembly for Dermacentor reticulatus: a key vector of tick-borne pathogens of public and veterinary health importance in Europe.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptome of Coxiella-like endosymbionts in Haemaphysalis longicornis during blood feeding.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe assembly of large and complex genomes can be costly since it typically requires the utilization of multiple sequencing technologies and access to high-performance computing, while creating a dependency on external service providers. The aim of this study was to independently generate draft genomes for the cattle ticks Rhipicephalus microplus and R. appendiculatus using Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology.
resultsExclusively, Oxford Nanopore sequence data were assembled with Shasta and finalized on the Amazon Web Services cloud platform, capitalizing on the availability of up to 90% discounted Spot instances. The assembled and polished R. microplus and R. appendiculatus genomes from our study were comparable to published tick genomes where multiple sequencing technologies and costly bioinformatic resources were utilized that are not readily accessible to low-resource environments. We predicted 52,412 genes for R. appendiculatus, with 31,747 of them being functionally annotated. The R. microplus annotation consisted of 60,935 predicted genes, with 32,263 being functionally annotated in the final file. The sequence data were also used to assemble and annotate genetically distinct Coxiella-like endosymbiont genomes for each tick species. The results indicated that each of the endosymbionts exhibited genome reductions. The Nanopore Q20 + library kit and flow cell were used to sequence the > 80% AT-rich mitochondrial DNA of both tick species. The sequencing generated accurate mitochondrial genomes, encountering imperfect base calling only in homopolymer regions exceeding 10 bases.
conclusionThis study presents an alternative approach for smaller laboratories with limited budgets to enter the field and participate in genomics without capital intensive investments, allowing for capacity building in a field normally exclusively accessible through collaboration and large funding opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.