ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Rapid and sustained differentiation of disease-suppressive phyllosphere microbiomes in tomato following experimental microbiome selection.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking microbiome structure to functional analysis identifies resilientFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis reveals associations among endophytic microbiome shifts, host transcriptional responses, and metabolic variation across variegated leaf sectors ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrobial-based treatments to protect plants against phytopathogens typically focus on soil-borne disease or the aboveground application of one or a few biocontrol microorganisms. However, diverse microbiomes may provide unique benefits to phytoprotection in the phyllosphere, by restricting pathogen access to niche space and/or through multiple forms of direct antagonism. We previously showed that successive experimental passaging of phyllosphere microbiomes along with the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto), which causes bacterial speck in tomato, led to the development of a disease suppressive microbial community. Here, we used amplicon sequencing to assess bacterial and fungal composition at the end of each passage, as well as shotgun metagenomics at key passages based on observed disease-suppressive phenotypes, to assess differences in functional potential between suppressive and non-suppressive communities.
resultsBacterial composition changed and diversity declined quickly due to passaging and remained low, particularly in treatments with Pto present, whereas fungal diversity did not. Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas populations were particularily enriched in disease-suppressive microbiomes compared to conducive microbiomes. The relative abundance of Pseudomonas syringae group gemonosp. 3 (the clade to which the introduced pathogen belongs) in shotgun metagenomic data was similar to what we observed for Pseudomonas ASVs in the 16S rRNA gene dataset. We also observed an increase in the abundance of genes associated with microbial antagonism at Passage 4, corresponding to the highest observed disease severity.
conclusionsTaxonomic richness and evenness were low within samples, with clustering occurring for suppressive or non-suppressive microbiomes. The relative abundance of genes associated with antagonism was higher for disease-suppressive phyllosphere microbiomes. This work is an important step towards understanding the microbe-microbe interactions within disease-suppressive phyllosphere communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.