ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025
The role of the tidal volume challenge test in volume responsiveness assessment: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The predictive value of tidal volume challenge-induced hemodynamic changes for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- Variation of perfusion index to evaluate fluid responsiveness during the preload challenge tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate prediction of volume responsiveness is fundamental to goal-directed fluid administration. Targeted fluid administration during surgery is critical to avoid hypervolemia or hypovolemia and their associated postoperative complications. Recently, lung-protective ventilation strategies with tidal volumes of less than 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight have been recommended as standard practice during surgeries. Nevertheless, these reduced tidal volumes diminish the reliability of dynamic indices, such as pulse pressure variation, for predicting volume responsiveness. To address this limitation, the tidal volume challenge has proven to be a reliable method. This challenge involves increasing the tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and observing the impact on hemodynamic parameters. Multiple studies have validated the efficacy of this test in both surgical patients and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. The tidal volume challenge effectively improves the accuracy of predicting fluid responsiveness by increasing both sensitivity and specificity. Established threshold values for changes in pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation offer precise clinical recommendations. However, additional cohorts and randomized controlled trials are imperative to validate the efficacy of the tidal volume challenge and advance fluid management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.