ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making among patients with a migration background in Belgium: a focus group study.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe growing cultural diversity in Belgium, with over one third of the population having a migration background, presents distinct challenges for primary healthcare, particularly in doctor-patient interactions. Medical decision-making (MDM) is at the core of clinical practice in primary healthcare. According to existing literature, MDM may be complicated not only by general challenges arising in intercultural health communication, but also by specific cultural preferences concerning patient autonomy. This study aims to examine preferences and challenges regarding MDM among patients with a migration background in Belgium, from the perspectives of patients and general practitioners (GPs).
methodsData were collected through five focus group discussions (FGDs), organised in November and December 2023. Three FGDs involved patients from the major migrant population groups in Belgium (Moroccan (n = 6), Turkish (n = 6), and sub-Saharan African (n = 7), and two FGDs involved GPs (n = 13). The data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsOur results show that preferences and challenges revolved around four key components of MDM: Exchange of medical information, decision-making agency, patient-provider relationship, and treatment plan. These preferences and challenges were shaped by a complex interplay of factors at the individual (e.g., patient education, provider attitudes), interpersonal (e.g., family dynamics, language barriers), institutional (e.g., legal framework, medical education), and cultural levels (e.g., religion, health beliefs).
conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of adopting an intersectional and multilayered perspective on MDM, which considers how various factors interact and shape preferences and challenges in MDM, depending on the individual and their context. Although it is impossible for GPs to be aware of every cultural preference, this study shows how GPs can engage in more culturally sensitive interactions with their patients. By also addressing the institutional factors that contribute to challenges in MDM, this approach can improve person-centred care by better accommodating each patient's unique needs and preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.