ArticleBMC psychology2025
Does the Chinese version of 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-20-C) measure alexithymia in Chinese young adolescents? Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis, network analysis, and latent profile analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Study of Emotion Concept Activation in Young Adults with High Versus Low Alexithymia Traits.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- The latent profile structure of alexithymia in the elderly and its relationship to eating behaviors: the mediating role of physical activity.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- In vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer Patients with Alexithymia and Its Influencing Factors: A Potential Profile Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) is a measure of three components of alexithymia: difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT). Although TAS-20 is being increasingly used to measure the alexithymia construct, ongoing controversies remain regarding its internal structure and cross-cultural and cross-group applicability. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of TAS-20 (TAS-20-C) among 1,355 Chinese young adolescents (mean age = 13.13; SD = 1.00; 52.6% boys) through multiple analytic approaches (i.e., confirmatory factor analysis, network analysis, and latent profile analysis). The confirmatory factor analysis showed reasonable goodness-of-fit for the bi-factorial model with three-dimensional structure and a negatively keyed item factor. However, the results derived from all analytic approaches suggested several items with poor psychometric properties (items 5, 10, 16, 18, 19, 20 from EOT and item 12 from DDF), including poor factor loading on their intended factor, low connectivity and predictability in the item network, and insufficient discrimination across heterogeneous groups. These issues could be attributed to an overabundance of negatively keyed items, translation biases, and the poor readability of certain items. The findings highlight the need for targeted revisions to both the wording and the content for these items, and offer insights into higher priority interventions aimed at improving alexithymia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.