Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597408›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2025

Treatment outcomes for substance use disorders across the African continent: a systematic review.

Claire Biribawa, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Deborah Louise Sinclair, Duncan Kabiito Matovu, Greg Swensen, Florian De Meyer, Moses Mukasa, David Kalema, Byamah Brian Mutamba, Wouter Vanderplasschen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claire BiribawaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. biribawaclaire@musph.ac.ug.
Nazarius Mbona TumwesigyeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Deborah Louise SinclairDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Duncan Kabiito MatovuSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Greg SwensenAcknowledge Education, Perth Campus, Perth, Australia.
Florian De MeyerDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Moses MukasaDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
David KalemaDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Byamah Brian MutambaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Wouter VanderplasschenDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Makerere University School of Public Health Seed grant Programme MakSPH-GRCB/2022/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders (SUDs) are increasingly recognized as a significant public health concern in Africa, placing considerable strain on the economy, healthcare system, and society at large. Given the dual disease burden of both infectious and non-communicable diseases, African countries may not prioritize addressing the emerging epidemic of SUDs. There is a paucity of scientific literature on SUD treatment outcomes following their management across the African continent. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to address this gap.

methodsWe conducted an electronic search of Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Medline (PubMed interface), Scopus, and PsycArticles. We included studies with participants who were diagnosed and treated for SUDs following internationally recognized diagnostic criteria in the African region as defined by geographical boundaries and had at least one treatment outcome measured and reported. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022362926).

resultsThirteen research studies were included across four African countries (South Africa - 8, Uganda - 2, Zambia - 2, and the Democratic Republic of Congo - 1). The treatment completion rates across all treatment modalities averaged 71.4%. A reduction in substance use was reported in nine of the 13 studies, with significant decreases observed in measures such as heavy drinking days and substance use severity scores. However, relapse rates ranged from 23 to 92%, with predictors including low recovery capital and poor social support. Substitution behaviours, such as increased alcohol or crystal methamphetamine use, were noted in some studies following abstinence from primary substances.

conclusionsThe findings suggest varying levels of efficacy for SUD treatment modalities in Africa, including reductions in substance use in some studies and moderate treatment completion rates. However, the high relapse rates underscore the need for comprehensive, resource-adapted interventions. The limited geographical scope of the literature, with studies predominantly from South Africa, points to a critical gap in research from other African countries and emphasizes the need for expanded research across the continent to inform scalable, evidence-based solutions for SUD management.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersAfricaHumansTreatment OutcomeAfricaAlcohol use disordersSubstance use disordersTreatment

Identifiers

PMID40597408
PMCPMC12211522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.