Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597378›Full record

ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2025

Therapeutic landscape of primary refractory and relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Recent advances and emerging therapies.

Allison M Bock, Narendranath Epperla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allison M BockHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Narendranath EpperlaHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. naren.epperla@hci.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive, yet curable malignancy, that has had practice changing treatment approvals in both the frontline and relapsed setting in the last 5 years. Advent of novel therapeutic options in the recent years has added greater complexity in treatment selection and optimal sequencing given multiple treatments with the same therapeutic target or immunotherapeutic mechanism of action. Key features impacting treatment selection include the timing of relapse, eligibility for curative options in the second line setting, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT), as well as considerations of mechanism of action and side effect profile. This article provides a comprehensive review on recently approved therapies for relapsed or refractory DLBCL, emerging cellular and non-cellular therapies, and a summary of our approach to the management of these patients.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLarge B-cell lymphomaRelapsed/refractory lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID40597378
PMCPMC12217534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.