ArticleCancer cell international2025
An EcDNA gene-based risk model and functional verification of a key ec-lncRNA AC016394.2 for prostate cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: Insights into genetic, RNA and metabolic markers (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Extrachromosomal DNA in Solid Tumors-Landscape, Immune Effects, and Resistance to Targeted Therapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer(PCa) ranks among the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in men. The progression and heterogeneity of tumors pose significant challenges to clinical prognosis and treatment strategies. Recently, extrachromosomal DNA(ecDNA) has emerged as a critical player in cancer biology, influencing tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Oncogenes and regulatory sequences carried on ecDNA(ecDNA genes) can significantly alter the biological characteristics of tumors and their clinical outcomes.
methodsIn this study, we obtained ecDNA genes specifically expressed in PCa from the ECGA database. To construct a prognostic risk model for Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival (BRFS), the two most common types of ecDNA genes which are protein-coding genes and long non-coding RNAs, were analyzed using Cox regression and LASSO regression techniques. Through KEGG/GO pathway enrichment analysis, we identified relevant pathways and analyzed the immune cell infiltration status. Functional assays, such as colony formation, CCK-8, migration, and invasion assays, were employed to assess the cellular functions of a key lncRNA AC016394.2.
resultsOur analysis identified six key ecDNA lncRNAs(ec-lncRNAs), including the ec-lncRNA AC016394.2, with significant prognostic value in PCa. By employing our risk scoring model, patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups, revealing significant differences in their BRFS outcomes. The model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and clinical relevance. The 1/3/5-year AUC of the model is close to 0.8, which is higher than most common clinical indicators such as Gleason score and TM staging. KEGG and GO pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the high-risk group was predominantly enriched in immune-related pathways. Additionally, immune cell infiltration analysis demonstrated notable differences in the distribution of specific immune cell populations between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Knockdown of AC016394.2 inhibited PCa cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
conclusionsThis study presents a novel ecDNA gene-based prognostic risk model for PCa, highlighting the functional importance of ec-lncRNA AC016394.2. These findings offer valuable insights into the biological role of ec-lncRNAs, highlighting their potential as targets for precision oncology and therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.