ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Comparison of T-DM1 and trastuzumab-pertuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective study.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP), it remains unclear whether to intensify treatment with T-DM1 or to continue with HP therapy in the presence of residual disease identified in postoperative pathology.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients at two cancer centers in China from January 2020 to August 2022. Patients were subsequently treated with either continued HP or intensified therapy with T-DM1 for one year. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify factors influencing patient outcomes. Propensity score matching(PSM) was employed to mitigate the impact of confounding variables, and disease-free survival(DFS) between the T-DM1 and HP groups was compared.
resultsBefore PSM, 114 patients were included, with 24 in the T-DM1 group and 90 in the HP group. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients in ypStage I/II had a higher DFS than those in ypStage III. In the T-DM1 group, 14 patients (58.3%) experienced thrombocytopenia, with 12 affected during cycles 2 to 4. After PSM, no statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (P = 0.48). The 1, 2, and 3-year DFS rates for the T-DM1 group were 94.7%, 94.7%, and 94.7%, respectively, while for the HP group, they were 100%,100%, and 89.5%.
conclusionsIn patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who have residual disease after receiving neoadjuvant treatment with HP, the continued administration of HP can achieve therapeutic effects comparable to those of T-DM1, without significant complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.