Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597329›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Concern and credibility: a factorial survey experiment on nurse judgments and intent to report patient-expressed safety events.

Patricia S Groves, Yelena Perkhounkova, Amany Farag, Maria Hein, Janice A Sabin, Matthew J Witry, Brad Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia S GrovesCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, 50 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. patricia-groves@uiowa.edu.
Yelena PerkhounkovaCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, 50 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Amany FaragCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, 50 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Maria HeinCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, 50 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Janice A SabinSchool of Medicine, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Box 358047, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Matthew J WitryCollege of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 180 South Grand Avenue, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Brad WrightUniversity of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 915 Greene Street, Ste 355, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. brad_wright@sc.edu.

Funding

Heeding patient voices: Patient, nurse, and event characteristics associated with nurse judgments about safety concerns conveyed by inpatients in minority and other health disparity populationsR21MD016139 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GROVES, PATRICIA · 2022 to 2023
$452k
NIMHD NIH HHS R21 MD016139NIMHD NIH HHS R21MD016139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalized patients continue to experience preventable harm and safety threats. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which nurse judgments of credibility and concern (perceived importance) mediated the relationships between patient demographic characteristics and nurse intent to report a patient-reported safety event while adjusting for nurse and event characteristics.

methodsA cross-sectional, quantitative study using a factorial survey experiment was conducted. Hospital nurses working in United States practice settings (N = 240) participated in an online survey. Path analysis was used to test the study model.

resultsOur findings indicate that increased nurse concern regarding a patient-reported safety event increased the likelihood of reporting the event to organizational incident reporting systems. Nurse concern also mediated the relationship between patient socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity (Black vs. non-Hispanic White) and nurses' intent to report. Other variables directly affecting intent to report were patient ethnicity (Hispanic White versus Non-Hispanic White), and event type (medication versus miscommunication). The degree of credibility judged by participants had no effect on intent to report.

conclusionsThese results suggest key motivations for nurse reporting are (a) the degree of concern (perceived importance) of the event and (b) the type of event, with medication errors associated with both greater nurse concern and intent to report. While literature suggests that patient characteristics are directly and indirectly associated with intent to report, our study suggests credibility is not a mitigating factor in that relationship. Overall, our study suggests interventions focusing on nurse judgments of importance may be more effective than those focused on judgments of credibility.

Indexed as

BiasFactorial survey experimentHospitalsNursingPatient safety reporting

Identifiers

PMID40597329
PMCPMC12211978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.