ArticleBMC medicine2025
Pediatric computed tomography scan and subsequent risk of malignancy: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea using National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for computed tomography (NCICT).
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiation dose and objective image quality of photon-counting detector computed tomography in pediatric imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Patient Shielding in Computed Tomography: Analysis of Influencing Factors and a Conceptual Framework for Decision-Making.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Age Thresholds and Gender Differences in Midpalatal Suture Maturation: A Cross-sectional Observational Study with CBCT for Maxillary Expansion Guidance.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Observational
- Size-specific dose estimation in pediatric computed tomography: From dose characterization to individualized optimization.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Reframing computed tomography-associated cancer concerns in lifesaving screening: keeping the focus on lives saved.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Radiation Dose Evaluation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Repeated Brain Computed Tomography Examinations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Overuse of abdominopelvic CT in pediatric emergencies: a large single-center study from a middle eastern tertiary hospital.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Higher carbohydrate quality, but not quantity, is associated with lower lung cancer risk in a population-based prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Application of AIIR algorithm for quality improvement and noise reduction in pediatric abdominal contrast-enhanced CT.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputed tomography (CT) has advanced medical diagnostics by offering detailed anatomical imaging, but its use in children raises concerns due to higher radiation doses and increased vulnerability. This study enhances prior research by using organ-specific radiation dose calculations for a more precise cancer risk assessment, investigating the associations between pediatric cancers and radiation doses in a large population cohort.
methodsThis nationwide cohort study analyzed National Health Insurance Service claims data from 2007 to 2015 with a focus on individuals < 20 years of age who underwent CT scans. We used the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision codes to identify an exposed cohort and excluded subjects with congenital anomalies or previous cancer diagnoses. The study had a 2-year lag period to minimize selection bias and reverse causation effects. We calculated the exposed organ dose for each organ during each CT scan using the national CT dose survey data and the National Cancer Institute for Computed Tomography (NCICT) dose calculator. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer incidence according to organ-specific radiation dose.
resultsFrom 2007 to 2015, 1,540,633 children underwent CT scans, with 1,380,896 being included in the final analysis. A significant dose-response relationship was observed: for every one standard deviation increase in organ-specific radiation dose, the overall cancer risk increased (HR 1.155, 95% CI: 1.139-1.171). Among solid malignancies, associations were observed for urinary cancer (HR 1.385, 95% CI: 1.291-1.486), thyroid cancer (HR 1.248, 95% CI: 1.218-1.278), brain cancer (HR 1.201, 95% CI: 1.177-1.225), and digestive system cancer (HR 1.285, 95% CI: 1.240-1.331). Hematologic malignancies, including leukemia (HR 1.074, 95% CI: 1.053-1.100) and other myeloid tumors (HR 1.087, 95% CI: 1.062-1.112), also showed increased risks.
conclusionsThis study revealed a significant relationship between increased radiation doses during CT and the potential risk of various cancers in pediatric patients. Although CT is an invaluable diagnostic tool for which the risks are not high using the current diagnostic doses, a risk/benefit analysis is appropriate, especially for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.