Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597288›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Meloidogyne incognita parasitism is affected by Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and its effects on tomato-associated microbiota.

Olivera Topalović, Enoch Narh Kudjordjie, Sanea Sheikh, Gnimavo Bonaventure Kenou, Frederik Bak, Flemming Ekelund, Mette Vestergård

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivera TopalovićDepartment of Biology, Section of Terrestrial Ecology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. olivera.topalovic@bio.ku.dk.
Enoch Narh KudjordjieDepartment of Agroecology, Section for Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark.
Sanea SheikhDepartment of Biology, Section of Terrestrial Ecology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gnimavo Bonaventure KenouDepartment of Agroecology, Section for Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark.
Frederik BakDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Flemming EkelundDepartment of Biology, Section of Terrestrial Ecology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. fekelund@bio.ku.dk.
Mette VestergårdDepartment of Agroecology, Section for Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark. mvestergard@agro.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multitrophic interactions in plant rhizosphere and endosphere can be beneficial or deleterious for the plant health. The parasitism by root-feeding nematodes is on the negative end of the interaction spectrum, and may be very difficult to control. Biological agents are a promising alternative to the environmentally harmful nematicides; however, their efficiency in natural soil often seems to be low due to their limited establishment and dispersal. Thus, understanding how the introduced biological agents interact with nematodes and the surrounding microbiota is necessary to improve sustainable management of root-feeding nematodes. Here, we conducted two experiments to study the effects of Pseudomonas protegens strain CHA0 (CHA0) on the performance of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. In the first experiment, we compared M. incognita performance in natural and sterilized soil in the presence and absence of CHA0. In the second experiment, we studied the composition of microbes in the rhizosphere and endosphere of tomato plants grown in native soil in response to M. incognita and CHA0.

resultsWe found that nematode performance, especially nematode reproduction, was significantly increased in native soil amended with CHA0. In addition, we found the highest relative abundance of Pseudomonas in tomato endosphere in response to nematode co-inoculations with CHA0, which suggests that root wounding, caused by nematodes, increased the entrance of inoculated and/or native Pseudomonas spp. As many Pseudomonas spp. are plant growth promoting, this may explain that plant growth was highest in this treatment. Furthermore, the rhizosphere of nematode-inoculated plants was enriched with Flavobacterium, Hydrogenophaga and Variovorax, which are genera generally associated with nematode-suppressive soils. On the other hand, other known nematode-suppressive genera such as Bacillus, Lysobacter, Devosia and Rhizobium were depleted in plants where nematodes were co-inoculated with CHA0, which may explain the higher nematode performance when plants were co-inoculated with CHA0.

conclusionsOur findings show that the effect of P. protegens strain CHA0 on M. incognita parasitism is influenced by the multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere and endosphere of tomato plants. We must understand these interactions thoroughly to optimize sustainable means to mitigate the root-knot nematodes.

Indexed as

16S rRNA geneITS regionMeloidogynePlant growthPlant-microbe interactionsPseudomonasRoot-feeding nematodes

Identifiers

PMID40597288
PMCPMC12211340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.