ArticleBMC psychology2025
Pre- and in-service teachers attribution beliefs for students' success and struggle in mathematics: first insights.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the attributional beliefs of pre-service and in-service elementary and middle school mathematics teachers regarding students' success and struggles in mathematics. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 in-service and pre-service teachers to explore their beliefs. Data were analyzed through content analysis, categorizing attributions into four main types: genetic, social, personal, and educational. The findings reveal that participants, selected through a convenience sampling method, expressed attributions related to both student success and struggle, reflecting the multifaceted nature of influences on students' mathematical performance. Pre-service teachers mentioned a broad range of attributions, including personal, social, and educational factors. In-service teachers tended to emphasize personal and genetic attributions, highlighting interest and innate ability as significant factors. While social and educational attributions, including family support and teacher quality, were discussed, they were less frequently highlighted by in-service teachers. This study highlights the importance of understanding teachers' beliefs, as these beliefs have the potential to shape instructional decisions and expectations. The findings suggest that future research should involve observational data and include larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.