ArticleBMC nursing2025
Factors influencing nurses' decision to blow the whistle: a systematic review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNurses play a central role in the entire process of notifying malpractice and unethical behaviour within healthcare facilities. Understanding which circumstances makes them go ahead and whistleblow is vital for ensuring that patient safety standards are maintained and ethical conduct is promoted.
objectiveThis research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of various factors affecting nurses' whistleblowing decisions at the individual, organizational, and social levels. It draws from both empirical and theoretical insights to capture the complexity of this decision-making process.
methodsA systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. A broad search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library was conducted using subject headings and keywords related to nurses and whistleblowing among the selected studies between 2014 and 2024. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Methodological quality was evaluated with the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Studies that met the inclusion criteria were chosen, and appropriate data were extracted and analyzed.
resultsSix studies, out of a total of 918, satisfied the inclusion criteria and were analysed in this review. Factors that influenced nurses' decisions to speak up about their observations included personal characteristics, organizational culture, and the nature of social relationships among healthcare team members. The results emphasized the significance of a culture of responsibility and honesty, and support for those who stand for a reason. Overall, these results supported the case for encouraging disclosure.
conclusionA summary of results reflects the intricate balance of factors that determine whether nurses' resort to blowing the whistle or not. Encouraging ethical practice, as well as the provision of a safe environment where nurses can voice their concerns about unethical behavior, is a core element of healthcare organizations' responsibilities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.