Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597250›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025

A systematic review on natural products with antimicrobial potential against WHO's priority pathogens.

SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi, Esmaeil Mehraeen, Pegah Mirzapour, Soudabeh Yarmohammadi, Soheil Dehghani, Sarina Zare, Shayan Gholami, Niloofar Attarian, Amene Abiri, Farid Farahani Rad and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Callus Induction inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Kaempferol inhibitsFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghiIranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Esmaeil MehraeenDepartment of Health Information Technology, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran.
Pegah MirzapourIranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soudabeh YarmohammadiTrauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Soheil DehghaniIranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sarina ZareSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shayan GholamiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Niloofar AttarianSchool of Medicine, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amene AbiriResearch Development Center, Arash Women Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farid Farahani RadSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir TabariSchool of Medicine, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh AfroughiIranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein GholipourSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Mahdi RoozbahaniIranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Roozbahani76.mohammad@gmail.com.
Shayesteh JahanfarDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global issue, with bacteria increasingly resistant to traditional antibiotics, resulting in more treatment failures and higher mortality rates. Resistance can be defined microbiologically or clinically and arises through genetic mutations or acquired traits. In response to this growing threat, the World Health Organization (WHO) established a priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in 2016 to guide the research and development of new antimicrobial agents. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated AMR, underscoring the urgent need for new antibiotics. Natural products continue to be a valuable source of antibacterial compounds and play a significant role in developing new antimicrobial treatments.

methodThis study employed a systematic review methodology, conducting comprehensive searches across PUBMED/MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE, and SCOPUS databases, adhering to modified PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. A research librarian assisted in developing the search strategy, with searches executed on May 5, 2024, without restrictions on publication dates. STUDY SELECTION PROCESS: Titles and abstracts were screened using Rayyan and Endnote. Inclusion criteria focused on original studies examining the antimicrobial effects of natural products against antibiotic-resistant pathogens, including risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals. The review identified significant effects of natural products on 12 families of antibiotic-resistant bacteria as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). These findings underscore the potential of natural compounds as therapeutic agents in combating antimicrobial resistance.

resultsA total of 4371 articles published between 2014 and 2024 were initially identified, from which 290 articles were selected for detailed review based on their relevance to the study period. All included studies were clinical trials. The analysis indicated that most of the research on dietary plants was conducted in countries within the Middle East, South America, and Africa. Among the pathogens investigated, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhi, and Staphylococcus aureus emerged as the most frequently studied due to their involvement in a wide range of infectious diseases. The findings revealed that alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, tannins, and terpenoids were the principal classes of plant-derived compounds exhibiting antioxidant activity against bacterial strains. These bioactive compounds were extracted using a variety of solvents, including ethanol, methanol, aqueous solutions, benzoate, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and methanolic preparations obtained from different plant parts such as leaves, bark, flowers, and roots. Notably, flavonoids represented 24.8% of the antioxidant product derivatives examined. The overall results underscore the significant therapeutic potential of regional medicinal plants in combating pathogens resistant to chemical drugs. Their antioxidant and cytotoxic properties may enhance the efficacy of existing antibiotic classes and contribute to reversing antimicrobial resistance.

conclusionBased on the findings of this review, the diverse effects and therapeutic efficacy of herbal compounds in managing antibiotic resistance were extensively examined. Consequently, in light of the demonstrated antimicrobial activities of these plant-derived compounds, further investigation into their potential as alternative agents to counteract antibiotic resistance has become increasingly essential.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBiological ProductsCOVID-19Drug Resistance, BacterialHumansWorld Health OrganizationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBiological ProductsAntibacterial agentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobialMDRMultidrug resistantNatural productPlant extracts

Identifiers

PMID40597250
PMCPMC12211454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.