Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597246›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2025

Impact of intergenerational trauma on second-generation descendants: a systematic review.

Charlotte El-Khalil, Denisa Caculidis Tudor, Catalin Nedelcea

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte El-KhalilFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania. charlotte.el-khalil59@drd.unibuc.ro.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6156-9255
Denisa Caculidis TudorFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-4443
Catalin NedelceaFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-1401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective traumas, such as war, genocide, natural disasters, and systemic oppression, have profound and lasting effects, not only on survivors but also on their descendants. Understanding how these traumas are transmitted across generations is essential to inform effective interventions and policy responses. This systematic review aimed to synthesize quantitative evidence on the physiological and psychological outcomes observed in second-generation descendants of individuals exposed to collective trauma. We included English-language, peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 1997 and 2022 that investigated intergenerational trauma among second-generation descendants of survivors of collective trauma. Exclusion criteria included qualitative studies, and those that involved third-generation descendants. We conducted a comprehensive search across six databases: PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and PubMed. The final search was completed in December 2022. Search terms included keywords such as "intergenerational trauma," "transgenerational trauma," "collective trauma," and "historical trauma." Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text assessments for eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Each study was assessed independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Out of 3,904 records identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that physiological changes in stress regulation and brain structure suggest biological embedding of trauma across generations. Socially, intergenerational trauma shaped relationships and identity, often fostering mistrust and emotional restraint. Psychologically, descendants showed elevated distress and trauma symptoms, with parental PTSD as a key predictor. The overall quality of evidence was limited by small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs, reliance on self-reported measures, and inadequate control for confounding factors. More longitudinal and methodologically rigorous studies are needed to better understand the pathways of trauma transmission and inform prevention and intervention strategies. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023433181).

Indexed as

Historical TraumaIntergenerational RelationsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurvivorsGenocideHumansIntergenerational traumaPsychological wellbeingPTSDSecond-generation descendantsSurvivors of traumaSystematic reviewTransgenerational trauma

Identifiers

PMID40597246
PMCPMC12220155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.