Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597224›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

To unionize, or not to unionize? A comparison of integrated plastic surgery residency program benefits.

Kerilyn N Godbe, Ryan Higginbotham, Erin Rauber, Sofia Victoria Corral-Vale, Niaman Nazir, Richard Korentager, Charles C Jehle

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kerilyn N GodbeDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Ryan HigginbothamUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Erin RauberUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Sofia Victoria Corral-ValeDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Niaman NazirDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Richard KorentagerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Charles C JehleDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. cjehle@kumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidency unionization provides increased leverage for trainees to negotiate compensation and benefits. However, no study to date has compared the benefits offered between unionized versus non-unionized hospital systems with integrated plastic surgery residencies.

methodsData was collected on unionization status and residency benefits (including salary, health insurance, and stipends) for the 2023-2024 post-graduate training year from all ACGME-accredited integrated plastic surgery residency programs via program websites, the American Medical Association (AMA) FREIDA Residency and Fellowship Database, and direct contact with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) office or plastic surgery residency coordinators. Statistical analysis for continuous and discrete variables was performed via Wilcoxon Two-Sample and Fischer exact tests, respectively.

resultsA total of 23% (20/85) of the integrated plastic surgery programs included in the study were unionized. There were no differences between unionized versus non-unionized programs for number of residents per year (2.75 versus 2.3, p = 0.08), city population (median 595,386, IQR 1,305,930; median 241,952, IQR 521,660; p = 0.09), or top 40 Doximity Program Reputation (50% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.76). Unionized programs had a higher base salary for PGY-1 (mean $72,809, SD $7,988 versus mean $65,008, SD $5,792; p = 0.0001). However, this trend reversed once salary was standardized for cost of living, with non-unionized residents having significantly higher salaries (mean $59,357, SD $7,407 versus mean $49,464, SD $8,045; p < 0.0001). Unionized residents had more vacation days per year (mean 20.4, SD 6 versus 17.9, SD 3.8; p = 0.039), more days of parental leave (mean 38.5, SD 15.3 versus mean 30.3, SD 9.7, p = 0.04), and a higher proportion of on-site child-care (12/16, 75% versus 20/49, 40.8%; p = 0.018), housing (8/14, 57.1% versus 4/47, 8.5%; p = 0.0003), and cell phone stipends (11/12, 91.7% versus 19/41, 46.3%; p = 0.0053). In comparison, non-unionized programs offered a higher proportion of parking stipends (38/49, 77.6% versus 6/16, 35.3%; p = 0.0014).

conclusionWhile non-unionized residents have higher standardized salaries, unionized residents have a higher proportion of competitive benefits including housing stipends, number of vacation days, and in-house childcare. This information may aid medical students in selecting future residency programs with benefit packages that would best fit their lifestyle. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencySurgery, PlasticHumansSalaries and Fringe BenefitsUnited StatesBenefitsGraduate medical educationMedical studentResidencyUnion

Identifiers

PMID40597224
PMCPMC12211409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.