ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Stimuli-responsive smart materials enabled high-performance biosensors for liquid biopsies.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid biopsies have emerged as a key tool that enables personalized medicine, enabling precise detection of biochemical parameters to tailor treatments to individual needs. Modern biosensors enable real-time detection, precise diagnosis, and dynamic monitoring by rapidly analyzing biomarkers such as nucleic acids, proteins, and metabolites in bodily fluids like blood, saliva, and urine. Despite their potential, many biosensors are still constrained by mono-functionality, sub-optimal sensitivity, bulky designs, and complex operation requirements. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive smart materials present a promising pathway to overcome these limitations. These materials enhance biomarker signal transduction, release, or amplification, leading to improved sensitivity, simplified workflows, and multi-target detection capabilities. Further exploration of the integration of these smart materials into biosensing is therefore essential. To this end, this review critically examines and compares recent progress in the development and application of physical, chemical, and biochemical stimuli-responsive smart materials in biosensing. Emphasis is placed on their responsiveness mechanisms, operational principles, and their role in advancing biosensor performance for biomarker detection in bodily fluids. Additionally, future perspectives and challenges in developing versatile, accurate, and user-friendly biosensors for point-of-care and clinical applications using these smart materials are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.