ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring barriers and facilitators for the potential implementation of the decision tool-functional independence in primary care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aging population presents challenges for healthcare, particularly in maintaining the functional independence of older adults. The Decision Support Tool for Functional Independence was developed to identify declines in functional independence and promote collaboration between healthcare professionals. The DST-FI is specifically designed to support interprofessional collaboration between medical and social care providers, such as GPs, physiotherapists, nurses, and social workers. This study examines the barriers and facilitators to implementing the tool in primary care.
methodsThis study was conducted in the Netherlands and included thirteen healthcare professionals-general practitioners, physiotherapists, practice nurses, community nurses, occupational therapists, and social workers-as well as two focus groups with older adults. The study was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A combination of deductive and inductive thematic analysis was used to identify and explore barriers and facilitators to implementation.
resultsKey facilitators included the tool's potential to enhance collaboration, support informed decision-making, and address societal pressures related to aging. However, four main barriers emerged: limited applicability for specific client groups (e.g., individuals with cognitive impairments or low health literacy), time constraints, issues of ownership among stakeholders, and challenges in preventive outreach.
conclusionsThe diversity and complexity of factors influencing the implementation of the Decision Support Tool for Functional Independence highlight the need for multifaceted, tailored strategies. Future research should focus on developing customized approaches to overcome identified barriers, exploring adaptations for a broader audience, and determining the appropriate healthcare professionals for the tool's practical application. The potential of the tool to foster interprofessional collaboration between general practitioners, physiotherapists, nurses, and social workers. and alleviate societal challenges, emphasizing its relevance in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.