ArticleBMC biotechnology2025
Assessing bone regeneration potential of 3D scaffold-free cell pellets from periodontal ligament and bone marrow stem cells.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local drug delivery systems for the periodontal microenvironment: from barrier penetration to multilevel synergy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Importin-7 promotes tension-induced osteogenesis by regulating RUNX2 nuclear translocation during orthodontic tooth movement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Oral stem cells in combination with hydrogels as biomimetic bioactive platforms for periodontal tissue engineering.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone defects pose a significant clinical challenge in clinical treatment, where stem cell-based tissue engineering strategies have emerged as a promising approach for bone regeneration. Notably, accumulating evidence suggests that scaffold-free three-dimensional cell pellets demonstrate therapeutic potential through direct implantation into bone defects area.
methodsTwo types of stem cells were isolated from bone and tooth, then cultured separately. Surface markers (CD34, CD45, CD90, CD105, CD146, STRO-1) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Bone marrow-derived and dental-derived CPs were cultured in ascorbic acid-supplemented growth medium. Histological morphology from CS to CP was examined through H&E staining. Cell pellets' biological properties were assessed in vitro via immunofluorescence, qPCR, and Western blot, and bone regeneration was evaluated using rat calvarial defect models.
resultsWe demonstrated comparable morphology and immunophenotype between BMSCs and PDLSCs. H&E staining and TUNEL assays revealed tightly organized histological structures and low apoptosis rates in 5-day cultured cell pellets. Immunofluorescence analysis showed no significant differences in COL-1 or early osteogenic marker ALP between PDLSC-CP and BMSC-CP; however, BMSC-CP exhibited higher osteoblast-related BSP expression, whereas PDLSC-CP displayed elevated bone remodeling-associated OPN levels. Consistent trends were observed in qPCR and Western blot analyses. In rat calvarial defect models, both CP types induced significant bone formation, with BMSC-CP demonstrating enhanced osteogenic capacity compared to PDLSC-CP.
conclusionBoth BMSC-CPs and PDLSC-CPs demonstrate osteogenic potential in scaffold-free 3D environments, whereas standardized controls and mechanistic investigations are required to establish their distinct therapeutic advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.