ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Access to pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a geospatial analysis of the racial/ethnic composition of areas with and without access.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends and regional disparities in hypoplastic left heart syndrome prevalence and mortality in the USA: a nationwide study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Colombia: outcomes, complication burden, and circuit-level constraints in a 15-year single-center cohort.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe propose that all communities should have access to lifesaving technologies like pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and that distance is one actionable component to accessibility. We chose to examine whether geographic access by distance to pediatric ECMO differs by race/ethnicity for populations historically excluded from health services and technologies.
methodsPopulation data was obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Pediatric ECMO program data was obtained from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. We compared the proportion of individuals that are American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latina(o), or White that live within and outside of a 200-mile distance from pediatric ECMO programs.
results43% of the total US land area falls outside of the US catchment area for pediatric ECMO; and 4.91% of the US population (or 16,433,563 persons) does not have access to a Pediatric ECMO center. One of every four individuals that identify as American Indian/Native American, one of every 100 who identify as Black/African American, one of every 12 that identify as Hispanic/Latina(o), and one of every 21 that identify as White live outside of the pediatric ECMO catchment area for the United States.
conclusionsAmerican Indian/Native Americans and Hispanic/Latina(o)s lack access to pediatric ECMO by proximity. While Black/African Americans live close to ECMO programs, previous studies show that this population has less access to primary and specialized care. Distance is one actionable measurement that should be used to extend access to medical technologies for populations that have historically been excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.