Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Application of Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment (MDT) clinical teaching model in the clinical teaching of some undergraduates of breast diseases in surgery.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of an MDT-CDIO integrated teaching model in orthopedic clinical education: a controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Assessment of the real MDT teaching model in medical imaging internship: an educational-oriented study.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Current status of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment capacity in county-level medical institutions in Sichuan Province, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Latent profile analysis of core competency in intravenous therapy among Chinese clinical nurses: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast surgery, emerging as an independent discipline with a wealth of specialist cases and an extensive case resource library in medical history. Contemporary clinical teaching faces challenges with traditional methods unable to address students' theoretical strength and practical limitations. The COVID-19 pandemic further strained learning environments, limiting students' exposure to patient diagnosis and treatment. Conventional clinical teaching, organized by disciplines, often results in technical isolation and a narrow clinical perspective, impeding the development of well-rounded medical professionals. Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Diagnosis and Treatment (MDT) emerges as a patient-centric, collaborative approach involving various medical departments in clinical decision-making. Despite its success in clinical settings, the effectiveness of MDT in undergraduate medical education remains largely unexplored.
methodsThis study conducted at the Breast Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, aimed to compare the learning outcomes of clinical interns under traditional and MDT teaching modes. In a randomized controlled trial with 140 participants, the MDT group received comprehensive training from diverse healthcare professionals, while the traditional group had standard teaching. Evaluation included pre-test and post-test assessments on knowledge acquisition, skill acquisition, and clinical decision-making. Longitudinal analysis and statistical tests, including t-tests and multiple regression, were employed.
resultsA total of 140 clinical medicine students participated, randomly assigned to MDT (n = 70) and Traditional Teaching Mode (n = 70) groups. Key baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, and completion rates, were comparable between groups. For each group's pre- and post-test scores, MDT group means consistently surpassed Traditional Teaching Mode, with significant differences (p < 0.05).Correlation analysis showed that there were no significant variable correlations between individual performance characteristics and test scores. Post-training, significant score improvements were observed in both groups across all tests (p < 2.2e-16). Utilizing the Wilcoxon rank sum test, pre-test differences were not significant. However, post-test scores favored the MDT group significantly (p = 0.0016, 2.8e-09, 3.6e-07). For students pursuing a master's, no statistically significant differences in specialty choice were observed between groups, though a trend towards more MDT students choosing surgical specialties was noted.
conclusionThis study pioneers the application of the MDT teaching method in breast cancer clinical education, comparing its efficacy against traditional teaching modes. Findings demonstrate that MDT-based breast cancer diagnosis and treatment education is more efficient and optimized, offering a transformative basis for clinical undergraduate education reform in China. The results advocate for the reconfiguration of multidisciplinary consultation clinical teaching and traditional methods, promising enhanced educational outcomes and heightened medical student knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.