Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597153›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Exploring safety aspects of maternity care through the lens of midwifery students' clinical experiences in Belgium, Czech republic, Estonia, Norway, Slovakia: A qualitative study.

Daniela Javornická, Synnøve Mari Eidsvik Folkvord, Annelies Jaeken, Terézia Krčméryová, Helena Kisvetrová, Mary Steen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela JavornickáThe Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 976/3, Olomouc, 775 15, Czech Republic. daniela.javornicka@upol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-5823
Synnøve Mari Eidsvik FolkvordFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Mail box 8600, Stavanger, 4036, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-0839
Annelies JaekenHealthcare Department, Midwifery Hogeschool PXL, PXL University College of Applied Arts and Sciences, Elfde-Liniestraat 24, Hasselt, B-3500, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8667-0960
Terézia KrčméryováFaculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University, Limbova 2651/12, Bratislava, 83101, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5953-9911
Helena KisvetrováThe Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 976/3, Olomouc, 775 15, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0174-5779
Mary SteenMidwifery in School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0362-5693

Funding

European Commission CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeeting the safety needs of women and newborns is crucial in preventing harm in maternity care. Recent recommendations suggest that childbirth needs to be understood through a broader framework, since maternal and newborn mortality/morbidity remain a global challenge. The unique role of midwifery students in clinical environment can provide and contribute to such understanding. This paper explores aspects of maternity care services impacting patient safety as identified by midwifery students in five European countries.

methodsA 2-stage qualitative design employed an interpretivist approach. Thirty-five midwifery students (Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, Norway, Slovakia) were recruited through purposive sampling to engage students with an Erasmus + experience. Stage 1 (2022-2023): Thirty-five written narratives were collected anonymously via an online 'Sharing LearnIng from Practice for Patient Safety' Learning Event Recording Tool. The dataset captured care in antenatal, maternity and postnatal wards. Stage 2 (2024): Three focus group discussions verified and added to the initial findings. Audio recordings were transcribed, NVivo software was utilised to assist reflexive thematic analysis in both stages.

resultsThree themes emerged from the analyses. 'Treat me well' theme captured the communication gaps and dehumanised assembly-line approach leading to compromised safety, obstetric violence and trauma. The second theme describes the paralysing impact of specific team members in 'Team dynamics and accountability', reducing a sense of agency among staff to advocate for patient safety. Theme 'Traumatised team-members' reveals the secondary trauma impact on emotional fatigue and defensive practices.

conclusionsMidwifery students emphasised the importance of individualised, well-communicated, and respectful care, with language barriers being addressed. Ensuring that patients feel safe seems equally relevant to physical safety. Collaborative teams prevent errors/hazards through interdisciplinary simulations, debriefings and students' continuous mentoring. By fostering a psychologically safe environment and implementing whistleblowing policies, the paralysing bystander effect among staff might be mitigated, and obstetric mistreatment, violence, and trauma could be addressed. Unresolved secondary trauma appears to increase unnecessary interventions and reduce the emotional availability of staff for patients in maternity care. Hence, effective recovery needs to be supported by management, and emotional resilience training should be incorporated into midwifery curricula to indirectly improve patient safety. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

MentorshipMidwiferyRespectful careSafetyStudentsTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40597153
PMCPMC12211180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.