ArticleBMC medical education2025
How much do medical students know about cancer risk factors?
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of cancer awareness levels among health sciences students.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, awareness, and perceptions of meningioma epidemiology among undergraduate medical students in Enugu, Nigeria: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Beliefs about causes of cancer among students around the world.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Awareness and Knowledge of Penile Cancer Among University Students in Ghana.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we aimed to determine the knowledge level of medical students regarding cancer risk factors (CRF).
methodsThis study was carried out in Gaziantep University (Gaziantep, Turkey) between February 10 and March 04 of 2022. A total of 532 students at Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine took part in the study. The sociodemographic data of the students and their level of knowledge about CRF were questioned in the survey. Risk status of modifiable CRF (smoking, alcohol, obesity, human papillomavirus, high-fat diet) for cancer types was asked with 36 questions. The maximum possible score was 36 points.
resultsOf the students, 270 (50.8%) were female, 262 (49.2%) were male, and the mean age was 22.63 ± 2.66 years. The mean CRF knowledge score of the participants was 23.17 ± 7.20 out of a maximum of 36. Knowledge scores of women and men were similar (23.06 ± 7.35 vs. 23.32 ± 7.08, respectively p = 0.674). The level of knowledge about CRF was significantly lower in preclinical students than in clinical students (p < 0.001). The knowledge score of those who received training on CRF was significantly higher than those who did not (p < 0.001). The most commonly known CRF was smoking and alcohol. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that being in clinical years (p < 0.001) and having received CRF training (p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of higher knowledge scores.
conclusionThis study indicates that knowledge about CRF among medical students remains suboptimal, with education and clinical exposure playing critical roles in improving scores. It was determined that medical students had serious lack of knowledge about CRF. The knowledge levels of men and women about CRF were similar. Education positively affected knowledge score on CRF, and thus we believe that medical education curricula need to be developed in this area. Educating students about modifiable CRF is of great importance due to both their own health behaviors and their positions in health service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.