ArticleBMC health services research2025
Long-term trends in specialized outpatient health care utilization: an analysis in the context of a primary health care reform.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healthcare utilization and cost analysis by social determinants of health: a prospective cohort study in Catalonia, Spain.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs primary health care forms the basis of the health care system, it is regarded as an efficient way to address main causes of, and risk factors for, poor health. In the Swedish health care system, general practitioners play a role in facilitating access to specialized health care and in coordinating care from other parts of the health care system. In Sweden, recent marketization efforts in primary health care, particularly the Patient Choice Reform, have adversely impacted geographical equity in access health care. This study aimed to examine long-term trends in specialized outpatient health care utilization in the context of the Patient Choice Reform, and to do so in regard to demographical, socioeconomic and geographical determinants of health care utilization.
methodRegister data from Region Skåne, the third most populous region in Sweden, was retrieved and a cohort was constructed, describing individuals’ health care utilization between 2007 and 2017. Utilization was measured as the number of outpatient visits to physicians in specialized health care, and based on trajectory analyses trends in utilization were identified. Differences in demographic, geographic and socioeconomic determinants between subgroups with distinct utilization trends were analyzed using logistic regression models.
resultsA closed cohort of 659,298 individuals was constructed. Utilization increased in all sex and age groups except for younger women where utilization decreased. Increased utilization was, in younger individuals, associated with lower socioeconomic status and, in older individuals, with higher socioeconomic status. In all female groups, increased utilization was associated with residence in urban areas and decreased utilization to residence in non-urban areas.
conclusionThis study provides key insights into long-term trends in outpatient SHC utilization during a time period that overlaps with the Patient Choice Reform. The impact of socioeconomic and geographic determinants on utilization varies in magnitude and direction between different age groups of the population in a similar pattern as previously described for primary health care. However, unlike previously reported trends of primary health care utilization, specialized health care utilization in younger women is decreasing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.