ArticleBMC nursing2025
Mental health literacy among Jordanian nurses: a cross-sectional study and scale validation.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Latent profile analysis of mental health literacy among nurses in tertiary general hospitals in Chongqing, China].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Mental health literacy among family nurses in Poland: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale in nursing students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMental health literacy (MHL) is critical for recognizing, managing, and preventing mental health disorders. Despite nurses' pivotal role in patient care, their level of mental health literacy (MHL) in Jordan remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess MHL among Jordanian nurses and validate the Jordanian version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (Jor-MHLS) for use in healthcare settings.
methodThis cross-sectional study was conducted at four major hospitals in Jordan: a university hospital, a military hospital, a governmental hospital, and a private hospital. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit nurses. Participants completed an Arabic version of the 27-item Jor-MHLS, which had been previously validated for the general population. The questionnaire was administered via electronic devices, either using a researcher-provided tablet or participants' own devices. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis were performed to assess the scale's validity and reliability, while quantile regression examined sociodemographic associations with MHL scores.
resultsThe study included 429 nurses. The median MHL score was 60 out of 100, indicating moderate literacy levels. Nurses with ≤ 5 years of experience had significantly higher MHL scores than those with > 20 years. CFA validated the four-factor model with satisfactory fit indices (χ²/df = 3.1, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.92). Rasch analysis confirmed proper item hierarchy and no significant gender-based differential item functioning. Cronbach's α values exceeded 0.70 across all factors, supporting the scale's reliability.
conclusionsThe findings suggested moderate MHL levels among Jordanian nurses and highlight the need for targeted educational interventions and stigma reduction programs to enhance MHL. The validation of the Jor-MHLS confirmed its utility as a robust tool for assessing MHL in healthcare contexts. Future studies should explore longitudinal interventions to address gaps and improve outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.