ArticleBMC cancer2025
Metabolic syndrome combined with insulin resistance showed great predictive value in evaluating recurrence in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of assisted reproductive technology in fertility preservation for female patients with malignant tumours of the reproductive systems.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular and AI enabled prognostication in endometrial cancer a 2015 to 2024 bibliometric Atlas and critical review.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The Role of "Metabolic Instability" as a New Risk Criterion in the Pathogenesis of Endometrial Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe metabolic risk score (MRS) is correlated with the progression of endometrial cancer (EC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRS on the recurrence of fertility-sparing treatment for early EC and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) patients.
methodsA retrospective study was designed with clinical data from patients admitted between January 2012 and December 2020 in our center. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to explore independent risk factors for recurrence after complete remission (CR). These factors were included in the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curve, combined with the log-rank test, was conducted to estimate a patient's cumulative recurrence rate.
resultsAll 109 patients with recurrence details after fertility preservation treatment were categorized into two subgroups (recurrence or no recurrence). Age (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18, P = 0.038), BMI (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = 0.013), FBG (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00-2.05, P = 0.048), MRS (HR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.45-2.46, P < 0.01), family history (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.05-5.27, P < 0.05), insulin resistance (IR, HR = 9.02, 95% CI: 3.15-25.82, P < 0.01), and histological type (HR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.48-7.64, P < 0.01) were risk factors for recurrence. Moreover, MRS (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.26-2.26, P < 0.01), IR (HR = 8.17, 95% CI: 2.52-26.52, P < 0.01), and histological type (HR = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.52-8.47, P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for recurrence, both in AEH and in EC. The addition of MRS or IR could significantly improve the predictive accuracy of recurrence. The AUC improves from 0.812 to 0.892 for the MRS model and from 0.842 to 0.892 for the IR model. Finally, categorized analysis found that the effects of MRS on recurrence are diverse in different clinical characteristics, including age, gestation, parity, PCOS, infertility history, IR, and metformin for both groups (all P < 0.05). Kaplan‒Meier curves showed that patients in the age ≥ 35 years, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
conclusionMRS is a new evaluating predictor that could significantly improve the predictive accuracy for recurrence in fertility preservation treatment for AEH and early EC patients, especially when combined with IR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.