ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Health information system in primary health care units of the Central Zone, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the effectiveness of seasonal malaria chemoprevention on malaria burden among children under 5 in northern Benin: a statistical modelling approach.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based classification of HIV viral load suppression in low-resource settings.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth information systems require the management of health information through health management information systems and research and knowledge management. In many low-income countries, including Ethiopia, poor data quality and limited use of health information remain major challenges in the health system. Reliable health data quality is essential for evidence-based decision-making and improving quality health service delivery. This study aimed to assess and explore the contextual factors of the quality and utilization of health information in primary health care units in the Central Zone, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.
methodsA facility-based cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative study design was used. A total of seven primary health care units and four district health offices were selected. Data were collected via document review, structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews. A three-month document review was conducted to assess data accuracy via lot quality assurance sampling. Forty-eight health professionals, including Woreda Health Office heads, facility heads, health management information system focal persons, service providers and health extension workers, were interviewed for quantitative analysis. Additionally, 23 key informants with the same roles participated in the qualitative interviews. Descriptive statistics were computed, and thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data.
resultsFour of the seven primary health care units have assigned health management information system personnel, and five of them have necessary equipment for health management information systems. The average lot quality assurance sampling of the primary health care units ranged from 35 to 60%, which falls below the national threshold of 90% data accuracy. In knowing and measuring the dimensions of data quality, the informants described this as a difficult task despite acknowledging its importance. Similarly, the culture of data use for decision making was limited.
conclusionThis study revealed that primary health care units in the Central Zone of Tigray face significant challenges in terms of data quality and utilization, primarily due to the limited capacity of service providers, unclear understanding of data quality dimensions and weak data use culture. The average lot quality assurance sampling accuracy rates are below the acceptable level, indicating issues in the data documentation and validation processes. Addressing these gaps through targeted capacity-building, including the integration of HMIS curricula at the university level and system-level improvements such as implementing computerized systems, ensuring accountability and allocating budgets, is needed to strengthen health information systems and enable evidence-based decision-making at all levels of the health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.