ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Comparison of effects of cyclosporine 0.05% and 0.1% in dry eye with Sjögren's syndrome.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomodulation of the Ocular Surface in Severe Dry Eye Disease: Expert-Driven Literature Review on Treatment Strategies with Description of Representative Challenging Cases.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Comparative Efficacy of Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, and Neurostimulatory Nasal Sprays for Moderate-to-Severe Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Clinical significance of corneal confocal microscopy characteristics and inflammatory cytokines in Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye disease.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy Differences of Different Acupuncture and Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the effects of cyclosporine 0.05% and 0.1% in dry eye with Sjögren's syndrome.
methods120 eyes of 60 patients who have been diagnosed with Sjögren's syndrome were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty patients (group 1, 60 eyes) were treated with cyclosporine 0.1% and 30 patients (group 2, 60 eyes) with cyclosporine 0.05%. Ocular Surface Disease Index Questionnaire (OSDI), Schirmer I test, noninvasive tear break up time (NItBUT), corneal staining score, MMP 9, meibography, meibum quality and expressibility scores, tear meniscus height, and impression cytology were examined before treatment and at 1 and 3 months after treatment.
resultsAll of dry eye signs and symptoms of both groups at 1 and 3 months were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, respectively (P < 0.05). OSDI, Schirmer I test, NItBUT, corneal and conunctival fluorescein score, MMP-9 grade, goblet cell density, and impression cytology grade of group1 were significantly improved compared with group 2 at 1 and 3 months after treatment (P < 0.05). The percentage of discontinued treatment in groups 1 and 2 was 26.7 and 3.3%, respectively.
conclusionCyclosporine 0.1% was more effective for relieving inflammatory dry eye signs and symptoms but less tolerable compared with cyclosporine 0.05% in dry eye with Sjögren's syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.