ArticleBMC cancer2025
A machine learning model based on CT radiomics for preoperatively differentiating intrahepatic mass-type cholangiocarcinoma and inflammatory pseudotumours.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatic inflammatory pseudotumours (IPTs) share similar imaging features, leading to unnecessary biopsies and surgeries. Accurate preoperative differentiation is essential. Current studies using traditional imaging analysis have limited accuracy. We developed a machine learning model based on clinical and CT radiomic features to improve diagnostic accuracy.
methodsFrom May 2008 to January 2024, the data of 112 patients with ICC and 34 patients with hepatic IPTs who underwent preoperative plain and enhanced CT scans and whose diseases were confirmed by surgery and pathology were retrospectively analysed. A radiomic feature set, a clinical feature set, and a radiomic + clinical feature set were developed, and each was used to construct 14 machine learning models. The optimal hyperparameters were identified using fivefold cross-validation and a grid search. Finally, the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, F1, Kappa value and other indicators were used to evaluate the performance of the models in the test sets to determine the optimal model for each feature subset.
resultsThe machine learning model constructed with the radiomic features of all the CT sequences and the fused model constructed with both clinical features + all the CT sequence radiomic features performed well (AUC = 0.91 and 0.97, respectively), whereas the performance of the machine learning model constructed with the clinical features alone was relatively poor (AUC = 0.73). In terms of model performance in identifying the two diseases, the accuracy of the fused model was better in identifying ICCs than in identifying IPTs.
conclusionA diagnostic model constructed from clinical and CT radiomic features quickly differentiated between IPT from ICC. The model may be helpful for the preoperative identification of IPTs and ICC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.