Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597048›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2025

Improving the time-efficiency of initial mental health assessment (triaging) using an online assessment tool followed by a clinical interview via phone: a randomised controlled trial.

Irosh Fernando, Rahul Gupta, Kate Simpson, Stuart Szwec, Mariko Carey, Agatha Conrad, Todd Heard, Lisa Lampe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Irosh FernandoHunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. Irosh.fernando@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-9277
Rahul GuptaHunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-6593
Kate SimpsonMental Health Line (MHL) and Northern Mental Health Emergency Care-Rural Access Program (NMHEC-RAP), Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Stuart SzwecHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-1934
Mariko CareySchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-1115
Agatha ConradMental Health -Research, Evaluation, Analysis & Dissemination (MH-READ) Unit, Hunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Todd HeardYouth Justice, NSW Department of Communities and Justice, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4137-4944
Lisa LampeHunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-8810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for time-efficient and accessible mental health assessment is a priority in the face of high demand, limited resources and a progressive increase in the percentage of adults experiencing high or very high levels of psychological distress. Although there is broader supportive evidence for using online assessment as a potential solution, there is relatively little evidence from randomised controlled trials.

objectiveTo investigate whether patient online self-reported clinical information can save clinician time in subsequent mental health assessment via phone.

methodsPatients referred to a public mental health service by general practitioners via fax during business hours between February 2020 and June 2022 were randomly allocated to either the intervention (self-reporting of clinical information followed by clinician assessment by phone) or control (clinician phone assessment as usual) arm. The time to complete the assessment (call duration) was the primary outcome measure.

resultsOut of 758 referrals assessed for eligibility, 377 (49.34%) entered the study and were randomised. Out of 184 referrals allocated to the intervention arm, the assessment was completed in 125, but only 81 were included in the analysis, mostly due to failure of clinicians to follow the protocol (completing the assessment without using self-reported data, likely due to inexperience with the novel process). Of 193 referrals allocated to the control arm, 135 completed the assessment and were included in the analysis. Average assessment completion time in the control arm was 25.19 min (standard deviation (SD) of 11.5 min) and 20.76 min (SD 7.49 min) in the intervention arm respectively, with a mean difference of 4.43 min (17.59% time reduction). When a mixed effects linear model was used to adjust for potential seasonal effect and correlation of outcome within clinicians, a statistically significant reduction of 3.29 min (P = 0.016, 95% CI (5.85, 0.73)) was still demonstrated by using online assessment.

conclusionThe use of online self-report clinical assessment by patients can save time to complete subsequent clinician assessment. Greater time-saving can be expected with better integration of this tool in workflow and increased clinician familiarity with using online self-reported data.

trial registration(registered retrospectively) Registry: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN). REGISTRATION NUMBER: anzctr.org.au ACTRN12624001293550. Date of registration: 24/10/2024.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesTriageAdultFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationSelf ReportTelephoneTime FactorsInternet-based mental health assessment or triagingMental health assessment by self-reporting clinical informationOnline mental health assessmentOnline mental health triagingOnline psychiatry assessmentOnline questionnaire for mental health assessmentRandomised controlled trialWeb-based mental health assessment

Identifiers

PMID40597048
PMCPMC12220592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.