Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597029›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Diversity and equity in medical education over the past decade: applications, matriculations, and the growing gaps.

Gang Lv, Xiangxiang Jiang, Jordan Franklin, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gang LvDepartment of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangxiang JiangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Jordan FranklinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Minghui LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 881 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA. mli54@uthsc.edu.
Jing YuanInstitute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China. jingyuan@um.edu.mo.
Z Kevin LuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. lu32@mailbox.sc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiversity and race-concordant relationships contribute to improved patient experiences and outcomes. In contrast, the representation of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) individuals in different medical specialties is declining. The essential pathway to improving diversity within the future workforce centers around the inclusion of a diverse cohort of medical students. We aimed to examine the diversity of medical school applications and admissions across sex, race and ethnicity over the past decade.

methodsThis study used data from the Association of American Medical Colleges from 2015 to 2024. URiM individuals refer to minority populations that are underrepresented in the medical profession, including Black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHPI). Diversity representation was measured using the representation index.

resultsThere was an increasing trend in medical school applicants among females but a decreasing trend among males. The number of Asian female applicants increased significantly (51.33%), while the numbers of Black (29.74%) and Hispanic (14.98%) female applicants also showed notable upward trends. Matriculation rates for Black females (mean: 33.64%; SD: 2.28%) and overall URiM females (mean: 35.94%; SD: 2.02%) have consistently remained below White females (mean: 44.22%; SD: 2.66%), Asian females (mean: 43.57%; SD: 2.59%), and the national average for females (mean: 40.96%; SD: 2.05%) over the past decade. The findings indicate that all racial and ethnic groups were underrepresented among both applicants and matriculants over the last decade, with the exception of Asian individuals. The representation index between matriculants and applicants among Black females (-1.46 vs. -1.19; P < 0.001) is widening, which may help explain the underrepresentation discrepancy for overall URiM females (-2.09 vs. -1.83; P < 0.001).

conclusionThis study highlights both progress and persistent challenges in achieving racial and ethnic diversity in U.S. medical education. While female and URiM applicant numbers have increased, matriculation disparities remain, especially among Black and URiM females. The widening representation gap between applicants and matriculants underscores structural barriers that continue to hinder equity in medical school admissions. A more inclusive physician workforce should begin with meaningful reform in how future doctors are recruited, supported, and selected.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEducation, MedicalMinority GroupsSchool Admission CriteriaSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesDisparityDiversityMatriculationMedical school applications and admissions

Identifiers

PMID40597029
PMCPMC12211177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.