ArticleBMC cancer2025
Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab/bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma-a multicentric study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to validate traditional biomarkers and drug targets in liver cancer recovery: a mini review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImmunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab is the current first-line standard of care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the Indian population, as there are limited studies. PATIENTS AND
methodsAll patients diagnosed with advanced HCC who received systemic therapy with atezolizumab bevacizumab as the first- or second-line therapy were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from two comprehensive cancer centres between September 2020 and May 2024 by accessing the medical records. As per the IMBrave 150 trial, patients were given atezolizumab 1200 mg and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Demographic details, adverse events, and radiological data were collected.
resultsWe included one hundred and four patients with a median age of 67 years. Majority of the patients had a compensated cirrhosis (n = 77; 74%), while Child Pugh class B cirrhosis was observed in 19 patients (18%), and class C cirrhosis in 3 patients (3%). The median OS was 14.8 (95% CI; 6.8 - 22.9) months and median PFS in the whole cohort was 6.2 months (95% CI; 2.5 - 9.9) monthsGlobally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks sixth in incidence and third among cancer-related dea.
conclusionThe real-world OS and PFS rates were lower than those of the IMBrave trial, most likely because 43% of our patients did not meet the inclusion criteria. We conclude that the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is a safe and effective option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients with manageable toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.