Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596940›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Contrast-enhanced mammography-based interpretable machine learning model for the prediction of the molecular subtype breast cancers.

Mengwei Ma, Weimin Xu, Jun Yang, Bowen Zheng, Chanjuan Wen, Sina Wang, Zeyuan Xu, Genggeng Qin, Weiguo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengwei Ma *Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Weimin Xu *Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Jun YangDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Bowen ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Chanjuan WenDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Sina WangDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Zeyuan XuDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Genggeng QinDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China. zealotq@smu.edu.cn.
Weiguo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China. chen1999@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to establish a machine learning prediction model to explore the correlation between contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) imaging features and molecular subtypes of mass-type breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included women with breast cancer who underwent CEM preoperatively between 2018 and 2021. We included 241 patients, which were randomly assigned to either a training or a test set in a 7:3 ratio. Twenty-one features were visually described, including four clinical features and seventeen radiological features, these radiological features which extracted from the CEM. Three binary classifications of subtypes were performed: Luminal vs. non-Luminal, HER2-enriched vs. non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative (TNBC) vs. non-triple-negative. A multinomial naive Bayes (MNB) machine learning scheme was employed for the classification, and the least absolute shrink age and selection operator method were used to select the most predictive features for the classifiers. The classification performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also utilized SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to explain the prediction model.

resultsThe model that used a combination of low energy (LE) and dual-energy subtraction (DES) achieved the best performance compared to using either of the two images alone, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.798 for Luminal vs. non-Luminal subtypes, 0.695 for TNBC vs. non-TNBC, and 0.773 for HER2-enriched vs. non-HER2-enriched. The SHAP algorithm shows that "LE_mass_margin_spiculated," "DES_mass_enhanced_margin_spiculated," and "DES_mass_internal_enhancement_homogeneous" have the most significant impact on the model's performance in predicting Luminal and non-Luminal breast cancer. "mass_calcification_relationship_no," "calcification_ type_no," and "LE_mass_margin_spiculated" have a considerable impact on the model's performance in predicting HER2 and non-HER2 breast cancer.

conclusionsThe radiological characteristics of breast tumors extracted from CEM were found to be associated with breast cancer subtypes in our study. Future research is needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaMachine LearningMammographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaBreast cancerContrast-enhanced mammographyInterpretable machine learning modelMolecular subtypeMultinomial naive BayesSHapley additive exPlanation

Identifiers

PMID40596940
PMCPMC12220444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.