ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Contrast-enhanced mammography-based interpretable machine learning model for the prediction of the molecular subtype breast cancers.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calibrated Transformer Fusion for Dual-View Low-Energy CESM Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Deep Learning-Derived Malignancy Scoring in Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for triple-negative breast cancer from imaging to multi-omics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to establish a machine learning prediction model to explore the correlation between contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) imaging features and molecular subtypes of mass-type breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included women with breast cancer who underwent CEM preoperatively between 2018 and 2021. We included 241 patients, which were randomly assigned to either a training or a test set in a 7:3 ratio. Twenty-one features were visually described, including four clinical features and seventeen radiological features, these radiological features which extracted from the CEM. Three binary classifications of subtypes were performed: Luminal vs. non-Luminal, HER2-enriched vs. non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative (TNBC) vs. non-triple-negative. A multinomial naive Bayes (MNB) machine learning scheme was employed for the classification, and the least absolute shrink age and selection operator method were used to select the most predictive features for the classifiers. The classification performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also utilized SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to explain the prediction model.
resultsThe model that used a combination of low energy (LE) and dual-energy subtraction (DES) achieved the best performance compared to using either of the two images alone, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.798 for Luminal vs. non-Luminal subtypes, 0.695 for TNBC vs. non-TNBC, and 0.773 for HER2-enriched vs. non-HER2-enriched. The SHAP algorithm shows that "LE_mass_margin_spiculated," "DES_mass_enhanced_margin_spiculated," and "DES_mass_internal_enhancement_homogeneous" have the most significant impact on the model's performance in predicting Luminal and non-Luminal breast cancer. "mass_calcification_relationship_no," "calcification_ type_no," and "LE_mass_margin_spiculated" have a considerable impact on the model's performance in predicting HER2 and non-HER2 breast cancer.
conclusionsThe radiological characteristics of breast tumors extracted from CEM were found to be associated with breast cancer subtypes in our study. Future research is needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.