ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Eff-ReLU-Net: a deep learning framework for multiclass wound classification.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Applications for Venous Ulcer Assessment and Wound Care: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds have emerged as a significant medical challenge due to their adverse effects, including infections leading to amputations. Over the past few years, the prevalence of chronic wounds has grown, thus posing significant health hazards. It is now becoming necessary to automate the wound assessment mechanism to limit the dependence of healthcare practitioners on manual methods. Therefore, a need exists for developing an effective wound classifier that enables practitioners to classify wounds quickly and reliably. This work proposed Eff-ReLU-Net, an improved EfficientNet-B0-based deep learning model for accurately identifying multiple categories of wounds. More precisely, we introduced the ReLU activation function over the Swish in our Eff-ReLU-Net because of its simplicity, reliability, and efficiency. Additionally, we introduced three fully connected dense layers at the end to reliably capture more distinct features, leading to improved multi-class wound classification. We also employed augmentation approaches such as fixed-angle rotations at 90°, 180°, and 270°, rotational invariance, random rotation, and translation to improve data diversity and samples for better model generalization and combating overfitting. The proposed model's effectiveness is assessed utilizing the publicly available AZH and Medetec wound datasets. We also conducted the cross-corpora evaluation to show the generalizability of our method. The proposed model achieved an accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of 92.33%, 97.66%, 95.33%, and 96.48% on Medetec, respectively. However, for the AZH dataset, the attained accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score are 90%, 89.45%, 92,19%, and 90.84%, respectively. These results validate the effectiveness of our proposed Eff-ReLU-Net method for classifying chronic wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.