ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Evaluating ocular torsion following inferior oblique weakening in superior oblique palsy: a pilot study using color fundus photography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and color fundus photography (CFP) for assessing ocular cyclotorsion in unilateral congenital superior oblique palsy (SOP) before and after inferior oblique disinsertion.
methodsThis prospective pilot study evaluated 18 patients (36 eyes) with unilateral congenital SOP. Disc-foveal angle (DFA) was measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively using CFP (analyzed with ImageJ) and Spectralis OCT (with FoDi software). Contralateral nonparetic eyes served as controls.
resultsPreoperative hypertropia (14.31 ± 4.15 prism diopter, PD) significantly improved postoperatively (1.46 ± 1.98 PD, P < 0.001). CFP measurements showed significantly greater cyclotorsion in paretic versus nonparetic eyes preoperatively (P = 0.001), while OCT revealed no inter-eye difference (P = 0.295). In paretic eyes, CFP-derived DFAs were significantly higher than OCT values both preoperatively (12.26 ± 4.72° vs. 8.87 ± 4.56°, P = 0.002) and postoperatively (7.25 ± 5.18° vs. 4.33 ± 3.98°, P = 0.005). Nonparetic eyes showed no significant inter-method differences at either timepoint (all P > 0.05). Inter-method reliability was moderate preoperatively (ICC = 0.693 paretic, 0.657 nonparetic) and improved postoperatively (ICC = 0.718 and 0.921, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated narrowing limits of agreement postoperatively (nonparetic: 8.48° to 4.40°; paretic: 7.97° to 7.50°), with no systematic bias.
conclusionSpectralis OCT with FoDi software provides a clinically useful alternative to CFP for cyclotorsion assessment in congenital SOP, though it may systematically underestimate DFA values in paretic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.