Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596904›Full record

SynthesisBMC emergency medicine2025

Prognostic models for predicting patient arrivals in emergency departments: an updated systematic review and research agenda.

Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec, Janez Žibert

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luka PetravićDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, Maribor, 2000, Slovenia. lpetravic@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-7316
Kaja Gril RoginaDepartment of Public Health, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-7652
Tit AlbrehtDepartment of Public Health, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1812-4381
Andreja KukecDepartment of Public Health, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-8409
Janez ŽibertCentre for Health Informatics and Statistics, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Health Sciences, Zdravstvena Pot 5, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-5431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency departments (ED) are struggling with an increased influx of patients. One of the methods to help departments prepare for surges of admittance is time series forecasting (TSF). The aim of this study was to create an overview of current literature to help guide future research. Firstly, we aimed to identify external variables used. Secondly, we tried to identify TSF methods used and their performance.

methodsWe included model development or validation studies that were forecasting patient arrivals to the ED and used external variables. We included studies on any forecast horizon and any forecasting methodology. Literature search was done through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase databases. We extracted data on methods and variables used. The study is reported according to TRIPOD-SRMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and authors' own dimensions.

resultsWe included 30 studies. Our analysis has identified 10 different groups of variables used in models. Weather and calendar variables were commonly used. We found 3 different families of TSF methods. However, none of the studies followed reporting guidelines and model code was seldom published.

conclusionsOur results identify the need for better reported results of model development and validation to better understand the role of external variables used in created models, as well as for more uniform reporting of results between different research groups and external validation of created models. Based on our findings, we also suggest a future research agenda for this field. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalModels, StatisticalPatient AdmissionForecastingHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40596904
PMCPMC12219896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.