SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025
Efficacy of phage therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs): a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacteriophage therapy for antimicrobial-resistant, biofilm‑associated diabetic foot infection: delivery routes, phage antibiotic synergy, and practical wound‑care integration.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- An All-in-One Nanoplatform for Synergistic Anti-Infection and Healing of Diabetic Wounds via Photothermal-Gas Therapy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Regenerative Microbiology: Harnessing Bacterial Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Signaling for Diabetic Wound Repair.Smart medicine · 2026Review
- Potential of phage therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot infections.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Microbial dysbiosis and wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: a mini review with a note on the role of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a severe complication of diabetes, often leading to infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, which complicate treatment and increase amputation risks. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy, targeting specific bacterial pathogens, has re-emerged as a promising alternative to antibiotics. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of phage therapy for DFUs.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 29, 2024, using keywords such as "phage therapy," "diabetic foot ulcers," and "bacteriophages." Included were original English-language studies investigating phage therapy for DFUs, while reviews and non-English articles were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers.
resultsTwenty-one studies demonstrated phage therapy's effectiveness against key DFU pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Phage cocktails showed superior efficacy in preventing bacterial regrowth and overcoming resistance compared to single phages. Synergistic effects with antibiotics (e.g., ciprofloxacin) were observed, enhancing biofilm penetration and bacterial eradication. Case studies reported high tolerability and clinical resolution, even in antibiotic-resistant infections. However, evidence remains limited to small-scale studies.
conclusionPhage therapy is a viable, safe option for MDR DFU infections, particularly due to its biofilm-disrupting properties and synergy with antibiotics. The lack of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) underscores the need for standardized protocols, broader phage cocktails for polymicrobial infections, and optimized delivery methods. Future research should prioritize RCTs to establish efficacy, safety, and regulatory pathways for clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.