ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
The value of diffusion-weighted imaging and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting the efficacy of medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt will be important to noninvasively evaluate the efficacy of treatment for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial carcinoma (EC) who wish to have children. The study aimed to explore the feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in predicting the efficacy of medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment for AEH and EC.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical-pathological data of 6 patients with AEH and 6 patients with EC. The treatment effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate were pathologically evaluated. Additionally, MRI examination was conducted at each follow-up at the 3rd and 6th month after treatment. Repeated measures variance analysis was used to compare statistically significant differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and maximum signal difference (MSD) of the lesion and corresponding endometrial site before treatment, and at the 3rd and 6th month after treatment. Endometrial thickness was analyzed utilizing the Friedman test. Furthermore, Fisher's exact probability method was used to determine if there was a significant difference in the time-intensity curve (TIC).
resultsThere was a statistically significant difference in endometrial thickness before treatment, and at the 3rd and 6th month after treatment for EC and AEH (P < 0.017). There was a statistically significant difference in the ADC values before treatment, and at the 3rd or 6th month after treatment for EC (P < 0.017). There was also a statistically significant difference in the type of TIC curve before and after treatment for EC (P < 0.001). However, the difference in MSD values was insignificant for EC and AEH before and after treatment (P > 0.05). No significant differences were noted in the ADC values, and type of TIC curve before and after treatment for AEH (P > 0.05).
conclusionsEndometrial thickness can be imaging markers for predicting complete remission of EC and AEH with medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment. ADC values and TIC curve types can be imaging markers for predicting complete remission of EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.