Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Comparison of sacovlm™ video laryngeal mask-guided intubation and fastrach combined with flexible bronchoscopy-guided intubation -a prospective study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06121895 (Evaluation of Differences in Placement Success and Postoperative Complications Between Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Fastrack Laryngeal Mask), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Differences in Placement Success and Postoperative Complications Between Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Fastrack Laryngeal Mask
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaryngeal masks (LMA) are significant in airway management. The newly developed video LMA (SaCoVLM™) allows direct visualization. In our study, we sought to compare the success of intubation between the SaCoVLM™ and the Fastrack LMA using fiberoptic bronchoscopy guidance. Our primary objective was total intubation time, while our secondary objective was postoperative complications.
methodsPatients (101) intubated with the SaCoVLM™ were categorized as Group V, while those intubated with the Fastrach LMA were categorized as Group F. LMA placement time, intubation time, total intubation time, and postoperative complications within the first 24 h were followed.
resultsWe found a shorter total intubation time with the SaCoVLM™. Moreover, patients in the Fastrack LMA experienced a higher incidence of sore throat and a greater frequency of blood-stained supraglottic airway devices (SADs). (p < 0.05).
conclusionsWe found that the SaCoVLM™ is an effective alternative to the Fastrack LMA in terms of LMA placement success and intubation success.
trial registrationNCT06121895.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.