ReviewBMC anesthesiology2025
Pediatric fascial plane blocks: an educational review with technique, tips & tricks.
Review in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noninferiority of Ultrasound-Guided Modified Intercostal Block to Traditional Approach for Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum in Children: A Randomized Trial.Pain research & management · 2026Trial
- Application of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Scoping Review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Fascial plane blocks in children: Mechanisms, indications, controversies, and practical guidance: A narrative review.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain management in pediatric patients is of utmost importance to ensure their well-being and prompt recovery. Current analgesia methods are not always sufficient, leading to suboptimal pain control and increased morbidity. Almost 80% of patients undergoing surgery experience postoperative pain. Results of many studies show that treatment of postoperative pain in children is inadequate. As such, in recent years, there has been growing interest in fascial plane blocks. Fascial plane blocks involve the injection of local anesthetics into the fascial planes surrounding targeted nerves, providing prolonged analgesia with reduced risk of systemic side effects. Studies have shown the efficacy of fascial plane blocks in providing effective analgesia for a variety of surgical procedures, including abdominal, thoracic, and orthopedic surgeries. With careful patient selection and appropriate technique, use of fascial plane blocks in pediatric patients can improve the quality of postoperative pain management, reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with systemic analgesics or well-known classical neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques. In addition to better pain control, the use of fascial plane blocks, as a part of multimodal analgesia regimen, may also reduce the need for opioid analgesics, thereby decreasing the risk of opioid-related adverse effects such as respiratory depression. In conclusion, fascial plane blocks represent a promising alternative to traditional analgesia methods for pediatric patients undergoing surgery. While further research is needed to establish their safety and efficacy for specific procedures in pediatric patients, the available evidence suggests that they may offer significant benefits in terms of pain management. Although fascial plane blocks are volume-dependent techniques, to minimize the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, it is advisable to avoid using more than 0.3-0.5 mL/kg of local anesthetic and to prefer lower concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.