ArticleBMC genomics2025
Genomic and functional insights into commensal streptococci with anti-pneumococcal activity.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus sp. strain KHUD_013 isolated from the human buccal mucosa.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Article
- The metabolic, microbial and immunological demands of pneumococcal colonisation.PLoS pathogens · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStreptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus), S. mitis, and S. oralis are closely related bacteria that colonize the human upper respiratory tract. While pneumococcus is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, S. mitis and S. oralis are generally considered commensals, rarely causing disease in immunocompetent hosts. Here, we characterized the genomes of seven commensal streptococcal strains (S. oralis A22 and S. mitis B22–G22) identified as potential biotherapeutics due to their bacteriocin-mediated antipneumococcal activity.
resultsComparative genomic analyses revealed key differences between these commensals and pneumococci. Commensal strains encode diverse adhesin-like proteins, absent in pneumococci, and lack key virulence factors such as pilus islets and pneumococcal surface proteins. They also possess extensive restriction-modification and type II toxin-antitoxin systems, alongside novel prophages, suggesting roles in genetic stability and phage defense. Metabolic adaptations in commensals indicate a “cheater” strategy, relying on extracellular metabolites from other microorganisms, particularly in the nutrient-scarce nasopharynx. Additionally, commensal strains exhibit distinct teichoic acid compositions, with galactose-rich lipoteichoic acids potentially enhancing niche adaptation. Capsular diversity was also observed, with some strains encoding unique polysaccharides. These findings highlight genomic features that likely enhance commensal colonization and survival in the upper respiratory tract, while distinguishing them from pneumococci.
conclusionsThis study highlights the genomic characteristics of the seven commensal streptococcal strains with broad anti-pneumococcal activity recently described and provides insights into species-specific traits that could inform targeted strategies for pneumococcal control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.