ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Coconut: covariate-assisted composite null hypothesis testing with applications to replicability analysis of high-throughput experimental data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple testing of composite null hypotheses is critical for identifying simultaneous signals across studies. While it is common to incorporate external information in simple null hypotheses, exploiting such auxiliary covariates to provide prior structural relationships among composite null hypotheses and boost the statistical power remains challenging.
resultsWe propose a robust and powerful covariate-assisted composite null hypothesis testing (CoCoNuT) procedure based on a Bayesian framework to identify replicable signals in two studies while asymptotically controlling the false discovery rate. CoCoNuT innovatively adopts a three-dimensional mixture model to consider two primary studies and an integrative auxiliary covariate jointly. While accounting for heterogeneity across studies, the local false discovery rate optimally captures cross-study and cross-feature information, providing improved rankings of feature importance.
conclusionsTheoretical and empirical evaluations confirm the validity and efficiency of CoCoNuT. Extensive simulations demonstrate that CoCoNuT outperforms conventional methods that do not exploit auxiliary covariates while controlling the FDR. We apply CoCoNuT to schizophrenia genome-wide association studies, illustrating its higher power in identifying replicable genetic variants with the assistance of relevant auxiliary studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.