Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596732›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025

Short time series obscure compensatory dynamics in ecological communities.

Mingyu Luo, Lauren M Hallett, Daniel C Reuman, Lauren G Shoemaker, Lei Zhao, Lin Jiang, Michel Loreau, Peter B Reich, David Tilman, Shaopeng Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mingyu LuoInstitute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and State Key Laboratory for Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-5218
Lauren M HallettEnvironmental Studies Program and Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Daniel C ReumanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Ecological Research, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Lauren G ShoemakerBotany Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Lei ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-4981
Lin JiangSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-0794
Michel LoreauInstitute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and State Key Laboratory for Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-495X
Peter B ReichInstitute for Global Change Biology and School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-662X
David TilmanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6395-7676
Shaopeng WangInstitute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and State Key Laboratory for Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Peking University, Beijing, China. shaopeng.wang@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-8879

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31988102National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32425036National Science Foundation (NSF) 2023474 and 2414418National Science Foundation (NSF) 2033292 and 2019528National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-1242531 and DEB-1753859National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB#1545288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degree of synchronous versus compensatory dynamics among species is crucial for determining the stability of ecological communities. Although robust quantification of species synchrony requires long-term observations, empirical studies are often based on short time series. Here we explore the effects of time series length on species synchrony by combining spectral analysis, dynamical community models and empirical plant community data. Our theoretical analyses show that competition contributes to decreasing species synchrony over long timescales but causes increases in synchrony over short timescales. As a result, species synchrony tends to decrease with time series length. In model communities, species synchrony calculated from long time series decreases with species diversity and competition, whereas that calculated from short time series increases with diversity and competition. Empirical analyses of >2,000 time series of plant communities support these theoretical predictions. Our analyses demonstrate that both species synchrony itself and its relationship with species richness can exhibit opposite patterns, depending on the length of time series, challenging the implicit assumption in ecological studies that observational length should not qualitatively alter patterns of interest. Our findings help reconcile results from theoretical and empirical studies on synchrony and have implications for sampling design.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiotaEcosystemPlant Physiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalPlantsPopulation DynamicsTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.