ArticleScientific reports2025
Advancing conventional guidelines in phytotoxicity studies assessing toxicant's impact on seedling morphology and anatomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interfacial engineering of GQD/TiORSC advances · 2026Article
- Soil dynamics and ecotoxicity of zinc extracted from black mass derived from discarded batteries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on plant ecotoxicology focus essentially on growth and biochemical processes, often overlooking anatomical and morphological alterations that may occur post-germination. These changes, however, offer valuable insights into early environmental stress, enabling proactive intervention and mitigation strategies. Thus, this study aimed to identify and characterize morphological and anatomical alterations during early seedlings' development, using a new Visual PhytoToxicity assessment (ViPTox) approach. This visual scoring system categorizes the alterations recorded into severity levels, offering a simple, reproducible method for assessing phytotoxicity based on observable changes in plant structure. A standard germination assay with Lactuca sativa was conducted using potassium dichromate (PD, reference compound) at 0.00, 100.5, 120.6, 144.7, 173.6, 208.3, and 250.0 mg/L. Standard endpoints, including germination rate, seedling size, and fresh and dry weight were evaluated alongside a novel ecotoxicological approach. Based on the seedling effects observed, a dichotomous key with a scoring system was defined using a classification range from 0 (normal seedling) to 10 (no germination - maximum damage), providing insights into the severity of observed alterations (e.g., absence of roots and/or leaves (score 9), chlorosis and necrosis (score 8), atrophy (score 7, 6, and 5), deformations (score 4 and 3), reduction of size (score 2 and 1)), in order to calculate the phyto-morphological damage (PMD). Considering the standard endpoints, no significant alterations were observed in L. sativa germination. However, a significant decrease in seedling size (> 20 %) and fresh weight (> 50 %) was observed, after exposure to the highest PD concentrations (173.6, 208.3, and 250.0 mg/L). Regarding the ViPTox approach, PMD was observed in all concentrations ≥ 120.6 mg/L of PD. Significant effects were observed even at lower PD concentrations (120.6 and 144.7 mg/L) where phyto-morphological damages (e.g., atrophy and deformations) were quantified, while standard endpoints were unaffected. ViPTox presents a reproducible, non-invasive, and cost-effective approach to evaluate seedling responses to environmental stress, complementing traditional assessment techniques while providing crucial insights that support proactive intervention and effective mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.