ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and optimization of an automatic transplanting device for plug tray vegetable seedlings using embedded system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely seedling transplantation, though crucial for horticulture, is increasingly becoming uncertain due to seasonal labour shortages, limited mechanization, and higher import and repair costs of automated vegetable transplanters in India. A simple and cost-effective vegetable transplanting device with automatic plug-tray seedling extraction feature was designed and developed considering very limited studies on simple and indigenous automatic seedling extractor design. The developed extractor uses a mechanical toggle mechanism for robustness and a close loop-controlled embedded system to drive it for optimum performance. The crank rotational speed, seedling root bulb moisture content, and needle penetration depth in root bulb were major affecting factors optimized using the RSM to maximize extraction ratio and minimize failure ratio. The seedling extractor performed optimally at an extraction rate of 38 seedlings per minute, bulb moisture content of 75%, and needle penetration depth of 30 mm. The field testing of the transplanting device with the automatic extractor resulted in seedling extraction ratio of 96.05% and field efficiency of 91.8% at 34.62 and 35.47 plantings.min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.