ArticleScientific reports2025
Sentiment analysis and topic modeling of social media data to explore public discourse on irritable bowel syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' Real-World Experiences With Pharmacologic Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Mixed-Methods Analysis and Classification of Social Media and E-Forum Posts.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- What do cancer patients discuss online regarding CINV management? A social media-based topic modeling study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluating Turkish society's approaches to hemorrhoid treatment using text mining and sentiment analysis methods.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A systematic review of the application of computational grounded theory method in healthcare research.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder affecting 10-15% of the global population, characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. This study aimed to analyze IBS-related discussions on X.com using sentiment analysis and topic modeling to understand patient experiences, concerns, and information needs from 2006 to 2024. A mixed-methods analysis of 12,345 IBS-related posts from X.com was conducted, collecting data using focused search terms ('IBS', 'irritable bowel syndrome', '#ibs', 'bowel syndrome'). After preprocessing, sentiment analysis was performed on 8,864 posts using the VADER algorithm. Topic modeling was conducted on 2,532 posts using Latent Dirichlet Allocation, focusing on posts with at least fifty words to ensure meaningful theme extraction. Sentiment analysis showed predominantly neutral (45.9%), positive (35.4%), and negative (18.7%) sentiments. Topic modeling revealed eight major themes: physical symptoms (15.6%), diet and triggers (15.1%), social support (14.2%), comorbidities (12.2%), research and treatment (12.2%), quality of life (12.0%), awareness (11.5%), and mental health (7.2%). Temporal analysis indicated increasing engagement with IBS-related content over time, suggesting growing public awareness and support needs. This study demonstrates the value of social media analysis in understanding IBS patient experiences and highlights the need for integrated care models addressing both physical and psychosocial aspects of the condition. The findings suggest healthcare providers should adopt more comprehensive, patient-centered approaches that consider the full spectrum of patient needs. Results underscore the importance of social media platforms in facilitating peer support and information sharing within the IBS community. Each identified theme offers specific clinical implications, from symptom management strategies to psychological support services. This study positions social media discourse analysis within the broader framework of patient-centered care, contributing to understanding how digital health communication can bridge the gap between clinical practice and lived patient experience in chronic illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.