ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence outperforms humans in morphology-based oocyte selection in cattle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Present and future opportunities for artificial intelligence applications in dairy cattle reproduction.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in bovine reproductive assessment: focus on oocytes and blastocysts.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Correlation Between Intrafollicular IL-10, Progesterone, and Bovine Oocyte Developmental Competence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) morphology is commonly used to assess oocyte quality. However, clear guidelines on interpreting COC morphology data are lacking as this evaluation method is subjective. In the present study, individual in vitro embryo production was used, allowing follow-up of blastocyst formation for each COC. Images of immature COCs were presented to embryologists and two artificial intelligence (AI) models: deep neural network (DNN) and random forest classifier (RF). The aims were to (1) determine the most relevant morphological characteristics in distinguishing qualitative COCs, (2) review human-made predictions, and (3) build predictive AI models. Our experiments identified cumulus size as pivotal characteristic of COC quality, while embryologists assigned ooplasm morphology as most important. Inspection of COCs by the human eye showed significant limitations, as evidenced by their low predictive ability (balanced accuracy: 42.9%) and fair reliability. Our AI models outperformed the embryologists, yielding a balanced accuracy of 79.3% and 71.2% for DNN and RF, respectively. The first AI models that successfully predict developmental competence of immature bovine oocytes were created, outperforming embryologists and offering an objective perspective for COC morphology assessment. AI has emerged as a novel tool for oocyte appreciation, assisting decision-making in the embryology lab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.