ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal variation of leaf nutrient retranslocation in exotic and indigenous tree species in Zagros forests, Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seasonal Variation in Leaf Mineral Nutrients and the Determination of the Nutritional Diagnostic Period ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plantations in degraded forest areas in arid and semi-arid regions play a vital role in restoring ecosystems, controlling erosion, and supporting local livelihoods. However, little is known about how exotic and native tree species influence nutrient dynamics in soil and foliage, particularly regarding nutrient retranslocation. This study evaluated seasonal variation in leaf nutrient concentrations and nutrient retranslocation patterns over a 6-month period (early April to late September) in 30-year-old plantations of two exotic needleleaf species (Cupressus arizonica, Pinus eldarica) and two indigenous broadleaf species (Amygdalus scoparia, Quercus brantii). The findings revealed significant differences among species groups. Broadleaf species generally exhibited higher concentrations of leaf nutrients (such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg) and lower C: N ratios than needleleaf species. Seasonal effects were evident, with leaf nutrient content generally higher in spring than in summer. The order of nutrient retranslocation was as follows: Ca < C < K < Mg < N < P. Further analysis using principal components highlighted the differences between broadleaf and needleleaf plantations in terms of soil and leaf nutrient status. These findings suggest that, due to its native status and greater contribution to soil fertility, Q. brantii is a suitable choice for reforestation in similarly degraded environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.