ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating hepatic fibrosis heterogeneity by three-dimensional imaging in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbes mediate the synergistic effects of dietary cholesterol and saturated fat in driving fibrosing MASH.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Bile canaliculi formation in primary hepatocytes requires α1β1 integrin-dependent adherens junction re-organization.Journal of cell science · 2025Article
- Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in the multi-omics era: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives from human and animal models.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although liver biopsy is a well-established technique to assess fibrosis it has several limitations, including invasive nature, semi-quantitative assessment methods, significant sampling and observer variability, making precise assessment of hepatic fibrosis challenging. Accurate and reliable modalities are crucial for clinical trials to characterize hepatic fibrosis monitorization effectively. We aimed to perform 3-dimensional imaging of optically transparent liver samples by light-sheet microscopy (LSM) to quantify extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Fifty-seven MASLD, thirty-eight chronic hepatitis patients and twelve healthy individuals were included. Liver tissues were cleared with a CLARITY method. 3D imaging of ECM was performed via the newly developed LSM. Collagen Proportionate Volume (CPV) and Elastin Proportionate Volume (EPV) values were calculated by analysis of over 200 sections per sample through morphometry. We have optimized a method which achieves transparency of liver tissues in advanced fibrotic stages of MASLD and optimized non-destructive slide-free fibrosis pathology of whole fresh and FFPE liver biopsy samples. Cut-off values for CPV and EPV were established for fibrotic stages. CPV and EPV analysis showed a considerable optical section heterogeneity resulting in a fibrosis stage of variance within the sample. Volumetric image analysis for fibrosis staging revealed that only 44% and 47% of optical sections would be staged the same for F3 and F4, respectively. For the first time, our findings demonstrate a novel method of analyzing 3D digital pathology of liver fibrosis using in-house LSM. Volumetric imaging of whole liver biopsy samples showed that fibrosis heterogeneity occurs even in different sections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.